← Teams

THPRD-Shull/Mohr

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Anh Ngo
published 4.5
—
Lorne Bulling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Luke Filose
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Zhi George
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.89
Charles Taguet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Christopher Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Halle Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.70
Justin Shull
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Sean Wei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Mohr
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Anita Rockwell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2021-12-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHalle Jackson / Levi Huddleston vs Alix Edwards / Mike Robertson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Jon Monson / Allison Buchman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCassia Carpio / Christopher Perez vs Eric Anderson / Shannon DeVall6-2, 6-2
2021-11-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLorne Bulling / Halle Jackson vs Shannon Bilstrom / James Ringelberg6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Katy Marcy / Christopher Graham6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnh Ngo / Anita Rockwell vs Nina Sanna / Carson Hall6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJustin Shull / Zhi George vs Anna Wilson / Brandon Kirlin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCassia Carpio / Charles Taguet vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-30Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Mary Klinger / Matt Simmering3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHalle Jackson / Michael Cheng vs Sierra Wright / Danny Anslinger6-3, 6-4
2021-10-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLorne Bulling / SarahJoan Salvador vs Jay Rubin / Aleina Tanabe6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Rockwell / Charles Taguet vs Divneet Kaur / Brandon Kirlin6-0, 6-2
2021-10-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Kyoko Adcock / Atom Fjeldsted6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSean Wei / Halle Jackson vs Yuya Fujii / Hong Huynh5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-19Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJustin Shull / Halle Jackson vs Valerie Wright / Lance Campbell6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSean Wei / Nicole Ralston vs Bill Rhoades / Nancy Korenek-Leveque7-5, 6-3
2021-09-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesZhi George / Lorne Bulling vs Bradley Sumoge / Chizuru Watanabe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Yuya Fujii / Anna Reutin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Anh Ngo
25W–6L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lorne Bulling
24W–6L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Luke Filose
106W–43L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Zhi George
116W–51L career
8%92%0%
4.05
4.5
Charles Taguet
104W–63L career
41%59%0%
3.89
4
Christopher Perez
48W–30L career
0%96%4%
3.87
4
Halle Jackson
123W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Justin Shull
136W–38L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Sean Wei
30W–16L career
19%79%2%
3.63
4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%80%20%
3.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.