Teams

Tetrault - All the Singles Ladies

2024 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-03vs Alewine - Lonely Artists GuildLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Sara Orthwein6-7, 3-5
L#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Kim Dowd6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Tina Halley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-31vs Rea - Rally Cats 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Stephanie Riley6-4, 5-5
W#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Chanpen Teeranon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-23vs Alewine - Lonely Artists GuildSplit 11
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Alexis McCary6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Sara Orthwein1-6, 1-6
2024-10-21vs Rea - Rally Cats 4.0Lost 02
L#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Ashten Rea3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Virginia Fung6-7, 3-4
2024-10-14vs Alewine - Lonely Artists GuildWon 10
W#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Sara Orthwein6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-12vs Rea - Rally Cats 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Danielle Barry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Virginia Fung0-6, 4-6
2024-10-10vs Rea - Rally Cats 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs Ashten Rea3-6, 3-6
2024-10-05vs Alewine - Lonely Artists GuildLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmy LaMoure vs Madison Simmons0-6, 1-6
2024-09-18vs Rea - Rally Cats 4.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Chanpen Teeranon4-6, 4-5
W#3 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Danielle Barry6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-13vs Alewine - Lonely Artists GuildWon 21
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Alexis McCary6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Tina Halley2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKatie Tetrault vs Christine Alewine6-4, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.74
Katie Tetrault
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.58
Amy LaMoure
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Rose + Katie Tetrault4164% gamesnot enough data
Amy LaMoure + Katie Tetrault123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tetrault + Xenia Baranova303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Amy LaMoure
172W–217L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.