Teams

Huffstatler 40+ 6.5

2026 Combo Doubles 40&Over-NE · Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-30vs Parker Spees TCC ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lindsey / Anna Sloan vs Tia Goodwin / Tiffany Edwards7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesReika Sato / Joy Whittle vs Gay Ramsey / Kathy Beasley7-6, 6-4
2026-08-25vs Lindsey 40+ 6.5 comboLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Littrell / Brandi Brown vs Mikki Gilliland / Ashley Gilliland4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlicia Milstead / Carley Johnston vs Susanne Lindsey / Rebekah Wiseman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Sloan / Amanda Sullivan vs Suzanne Cervantes / Mindy Austin3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Leigh Huffstatler
published
3.24
Michelle Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Carley Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Brandi Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Reika Sato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Anna Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Lacey Harden
published
2.68
Joy Whittle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Alicia Milstead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Lindsey + Lacey Harden10358% games+3.4% vs expected
Leigh Huffstatler + Brandi Brown4747% games+2.0% vs expected
Leigh Huffstatler + Michelle Lindsey224 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Harden + Brandi Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Joy Whittle + Reika Sato404 matchesnot enough data
Carley Johnston + Michelle Lindsey303 matchesnot enough data
Carley Johnston + Reika Sato213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Huffstatler
24W–28L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Michelle Lindsey
58W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Carley Johnston
33W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Brandi Brown
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Reika Sato
34W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.95
3
Anna Sloan
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Lacey Harden
37W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Joy Whittle
42W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
3
Alicia Milstead
34W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.