Teams

MZiewacz (Olde Providence Racquet Club )

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-01vs BSchwartz/SPollak (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristina McWilliams / David Halvorsen vs Christine Kahm / Benjamin Schwartz2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-07-25vs MShea (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Niess / Matthew Niess vs Matt Verrill / Kristin Verrill4-6, 5-7
2023-07-11vs AStein (Ballantyne CC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Halvorsen / Sara Lineberger vs Wendy Lutgring / Kevin Sferro6-3, 6-4
2023-06-20vs CGardner/NSiens (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Niess / Matthew Niess vs Christopher Gardner / Anna Kamenova2-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs MAhern (Palisades CC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Niess / Matthew Niess vs Kevin Monty / Stacey Livingston3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs BSchwartz/SPollak (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Niess / Sean Hickey vs Sophie Graham / Saurabh Tyagi5-7, 4-6
2023-05-30vs MShea (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Halvorsen / Eryn Ratcliffe vs Kristin Bergeson / Chandrasekar Swaminathan6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Carolyn Drake
published 4.5
4.06
Eryn Ratcliffe
published
3.93
3.86
Sarah Niess
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Andrew Sanctis
published 4
3.73
Sean Hickey
published
3.68
David Halvorsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Sara Lineberger
published
3.58
Loren Kane
published
3.58
Michelle Ziewacz
published
3.40
Matthew Niess
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Andrew McWilliams
published 3.5
Lisa Kane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Niess + Matthew Niess9657% games+7.5% vs expected
Christina McWilliams + Andrew McWilliams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolyn Drake
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
Eryn Ratcliffe
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
4.06
4
Christina McWilliams
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Sarah Niess
68W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Andrew Sanctis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sean Hickey
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
David Halvorsen
38W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Sara Lineberger
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Loren Kane
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michelle Ziewacz
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Matthew Niess
10W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Andrew McWilliams
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
Lisa Kane
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.