Teams

RCCB - Hingle

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-11vs Fee - TorcuatorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Katherine Hingle vs Daricca Facciobene / Brenda Tarquinio6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLael Woods / Stephanie Lasko vs Sandy Cuddeback / Faith Torcuator2-6, 4-6
2024-10-30vs Fee - TorcuatorWon 30
W#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Rachel Gould vs Brenda Tarquinio / Faith Torcuator6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesErin Schlitts vs Jenna Bajus6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLael Woods / Lindsay Nichols vs Debra Grayson / Michelle Dunn6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Lindsay Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Erin Schlitts
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Rachel Gould
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Ruthan Tattersall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Katherine Hingle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lael Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Eileen Bentley
published
2.47
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruthan Tattersall + Katherine Hingle4257% games+5.7% vs expected
Lael Woods + Stephanie Lasko1440% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Gould + Erin Schlitts134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Nichols + Stephanie Lasko213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Nichols
33W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Erin Schlitts
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Ruthan Tattersall
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Katherine Hingle
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Eileen Bentley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
3
Christy Galzerano
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.