Teams

Redding/White 55+ 6.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
3.25
Kathy Chinnis
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
2.95
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
2.85
Sue White
published
2.83
Linda Chapman
published
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.69
Eleanor Redding
published 3
2.64
Lydia Nadel
published
Katy Vuncannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Gladys Dunn213 matchesnot enough data
Betsey Wells + Lydia Nadel123 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Redding + Kathy Chinnis033 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Michaud + Cindy Wood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kathy Chinnis
17W–33L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Betsey Wells
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jill Elam
19W–31L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Linda Chapman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Katy Vuncannon
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.