Teams

SKrenz (Pine Lake)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-02vs NHaskins (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGretchen Pfeiffer / Allison Moseley vs Katie Brewer / Sophie Graham2-6, 2-6
2024-04-25vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAshle Basden / Lydia Schoeck vs Holly McClure / Kathleen Johnstone6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-04-24vs WParker/RSchuler (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Boyles / Allison Moseley vs Laura Grigoleit / Caroline Frank1-6, 3-6
2024-04-18vs CGoldblatt/STo (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Moseley / Lydia Schoeck vs Caroline Pickup / Kelly Floyd1-6, 0-6
2024-04-04vs SReynolds (Hornets Nest)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Moseley / Robin Boyles vs Elizabeth Strack / Margaret Schrimsher2-6, 3-6
2024-03-07vs NHaskins (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Allison Moseley vs Katie Brewer / Kimberly Burkhamer6-4, 6-1
2024-02-29vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Moseley / Sarah Krenz vs Lindsey Kerr / Caroline Sjogren6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Sarah Krenz
published
3.40
Robin Boyles
published
3.35
Tracy Graham
published
3.19
Connie Daniel
published 3.5
3.19
Allison Moseley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Ashle Basden
published 3.5
Gretchen Pfeiffer
published
Kathleen Ramsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Moseley + Lydia Schoeck13656% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Sarah Krenz
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Robin Boyles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tracy Graham
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Connie Daniel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Allison Moseley
52W–69L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Gretchen Pfeiffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Ramsey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.