Teams

Winner/Dillon/Cervantes

2026 Broward Adult ESL 55 & Over 7.0 · 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-06vs MissionBay/SliverSetters/LevineWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Gibson / Janice Carter vs Robin Hayden / Katherine Lavin7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendy Calvet / Cindy Zimmerman vs Catherine Thomas / Maria Elena Rojas6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Cervantes / Gloria Bolgar vs Patricia Kapp / Angela Eisenberg7-5, 6-2
2025-11-22vs Midtown/CraigWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Gibson / Janice Carter vs Manja Rippen / Claudia Torres6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Cervantes / Ana Pastorino vs Ledaliz Collazo / Maria Parjus7-5, 6-2
2025-11-20vs Wrc/CordobaWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Gibson / Cynthia Cervantes vs JANNETH CARBALLIDO / Maria Avellaneda7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-08vs MissionBay/SliverSetters/LevineWon 20
W#2 DoublesTammy Gibson / Janice Carter vs Jodi Crespi / Jessica Arnesen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Zimmerman / Wendy Calvet vs Dori Eden / Patricia Kapp6-2, 7-5
2025-11-06vs Wrc/CordobaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Cervantes / Ana Pastorino vs Mariela Cordoba / Virna Trujillo7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Bolgar / Tammy Gibson vs Sally Hernadez / Maria Avellaneda6-4, 6-2
2025-11-01vs Midtown/CraigWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Carter / Cynthia Cervantes vs Alicia Dominguez / Maritza Craig6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Gibson / Ana Pastorino vs Jennifer Montgomery / Deborah Marshall6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winner/Dillon/Cervantes601539131
2MissionBay/SliverSetters/Levine1521633212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Veronica Wank
published 4
3.53
Cindy Zimmerman
published 4
3.51
Denise Kohlman
published 3.5
3.47
Gloria Bolgar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Tammy Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Ana Pastorino
published 3.5
3.25
Janice Carter
published
3.16
Wendy Calvet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Cynthia Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Theresa Caruso
published
2.83
Theoni Anagnostou
published
2.75
Leah Parodi
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Kohlman + Janice Carter7262% games+9.7% vs expected
Janice Carter + Gloria Bolgar9360% games+8.3% vs expected
Gloria Bolgar + Tammy Gibson8556% games+5.9% vs expected
Gloria Bolgar + Ana Pastorino4261% games+4.9% vs expected
Janice Carter + Tammy Gibson7062% games+0.1% vs expected
Ana Pastorino + Cynthia Cervantes8154% games−0.4% vs expected
Theresa Caruso + Ana Pastorino6846% games−4.6% vs expected
Wendy Calvet + Cynthia Cervantes6946% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Cindy Zimmerman
27W–55L career · type S · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Denise Kohlman
20W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Gloria Bolgar
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Tammy Gibson
30W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ana Pastorino
288W–153L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Janice Carter
73W–87L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
Wendy Calvet
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cynthia Cervantes
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Theresa Caruso
98W–182L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Theoni Anagnostou
29W–84L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Leah Parodi
76W–126L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.