Teams

CCC ROSS

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-14vs RC RUCKER/BOURGEOISLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Podell / Lisa Yager vs Keri Hickman / Stephanie Brentlinger5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Pumphrey vs MEREDITH RAY4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeri Perryman / Brenda Anderson vs Rebecca Rucker / Regan Landreth0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Barham / Jill Cassady vs DeMar Sciuto / Janet Gardiner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Kelsey Blackledge
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Shannon Barham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Mary McKee
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.18
Linda Paul
published
3.13
Kelly Pumphrey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Lisa Yager
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Lisa Podell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Jill Cassady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Skipper Schmidt
published
2.85
Tracey Kesterson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Meri Perryman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brenda Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Podell + Lisa Yager224 matchesnot enough data
Kelsey Blackledge + Lisa Yager314 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Barham + Meri Perryman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Blackledge
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Shannon Barham
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Mary McKee
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Linda Paul
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Pumphrey
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lisa Yager
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lisa Podell
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Jill Cassady
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Skipper Schmidt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Tracey Kesterson
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Meri Perryman
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Brenda Anderson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.