Teams

Stevens - CCNC

Sandhills Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Combo 55 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Highland Country Club
Sep 27 3:00 PM
Country Club of North Carolina
Oct 4 3:00 PM
Highland Country Club
2026-08-30vs Fisher - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hasty / Kathy Channell vs Kimberly Fisher / Emily Schaefer5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Goodman / Ellen Tarry vs Christina McKenzie / Andrea Tatman6-1, 6-3
2026-08-23vs Fisher - Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Dodd / Elizabeth Hasty vs Kimberly Fisher / Emily Schaefer2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Tarry / Cindy Goodman vs Laura Yarborough / Megan Mannell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Clark / Elaine van Vliet vs Amy Perko / Catherine Christianson2-6, 1-6
2026-08-16vs Fisher - Highland Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Clark / ELIZABETH BODE vs Kimberly Fisher / Megan Mannell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Tarry / Cindy Goodman vs Amy Perko / Catherine Christianson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrances Morris / Michelle Porter vs Emily Schaefer / Tammy Batten6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Cindy Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christy Clark
published 4.5
4.00
Kathy Channell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Ellen Tarry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Michelle Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Elizabeth Hasty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
ELIZABETH BODE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Elaine van Vliet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Heidi Stevens
published
Julie Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Stevens + ELIZABETH BODE123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Goodman + Ellen Tarry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Goodman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Christy Clark
48W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Kathy Channell
88W–157L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Ellen Tarry
155W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
Michelle Porter
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.97
Elizabeth Hasty
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
ELIZABETH BODE
12W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.59
Elaine van Vliet
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Heidi Stevens
16W–40L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Julie Dodd
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.