Teams

Alachua/Molyneux/18&Over4.5W

2024 Alachua Adult 18 & Over - Spring Season · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-01vs DB - Van RoyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Wheeler Crawford vs Sheena Prasad / Ekanong van Roy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNikki Perrino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEva Vasquez-Peterson / Leigh Chak vs Cortney Wright / Tracey Bryant2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-09vs DB - Van RoySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Chak / Rachel Rodriguez vs Christine Padron / Lynn Godwin6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTara Johnson / Kelly Banes vs Sheena Prasad / Cortney Wright4-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs DB - Van RoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Jessica Bonano vs Darby Townsend / Tracey Bryant7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Stricklin / Leigh Chak vs Lynn Godwin / Christine Padron7-5, 6-4
2024-04-25vs DB - Van RoyWon 20
W#1 SinglesNikki Perrino vs Darby Townsend6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Kelly Banes vs Tracey Bryant / Ekanong van Roy6-3, 6-1
2024-04-18vs DB - Van RoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Stricklin / MEGAN MOLYNEUX vs Marie Vanasse / Cortney Wright2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Jessica Bonano vs Lynn Godwin / Sheena Prasad2-6, 2-6
2024-04-11vs DB - Van RoyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Kelly Banes vs Lynn Godwin / Christine Padron7-5, 6-2
2024-04-04vs DB - Van RoyWon 20
W#1 SinglesNikki Perrino vs Marie Vanasse6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Dace / Anne Stricklin vs Christine Padron / Darby Townsend6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kelly Banes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Nikki Perrino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Dace
published
Anne Stricklin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Wheeler Crawford
published
Jessica Bonano
published
Leigh Chak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Nikki Perrino
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Anne Stricklin
36W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jessica Bonano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.