Teams

Lynbrook, Blue/Low

2025 40&Over Mixed · 9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.36 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Point Set, KarlinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Naomi Daniels vs Danny Casesa / Cristina Leek2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFrancesca Roth / Eli Stahl vs Yen So / Claudio Eulau6-2, 6-4
2025-04-27vs Eastern/Chua-McAlonie/40&Over9.0XDLost 02
L#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Misha Monticciolo vs Brad Shafran / Edina Jung1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Klee / Joanne Persico vs Timothy Hill / Roslyn Chua-Mcalonie2-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs Point Set, KarlinWon 21
W#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Naomi Daniels vs Jeffrey Snow / Cristina Bryan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMitchell Low / Katie Figgie vs Raphael Wilson / Joyce Narciso-Raikos6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTerry Kossegi / Francesca Roth vs Dan Jones / Antonella Karlin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-06vs Eastern/Chua-McAlonie/40&Over9.0XDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Roth / Fernando Juguera vs Brad Shafran / Erin Harris2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMitchell Low / Katie Figgie vs Eric Chaffer / Kim Pflaumer6-2, 6-3
2025-03-16vs Eastern/Chua-McAlonie/40&Over9.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Karyn Sackstein vs Marvin Jeffrey / Edina Jung3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMitchell Low / Katie Figgie vs Eric Chaffer / Kim Pflaumer1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTerry Kossegi / Diann Starcke vs Keith Lopez / Michelle Craddock5-7, 0-6
2025-03-02vs Point Set, KarlinWon 21
L#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Karyn Sackstein vs Jeffrey Snow / Cristina Bryan6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMitchell Low / Katie Figgie vs Cecil Hollins / Nancy Turnblacer6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEli Stahl / Naomi Daniels vs Jeff Kee / Cristina Leek6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Chua-McAlonie/40&Over9.0XD0612613127
2Point Set, Karlin069922173
3Lynbrook, Blue/Low0661224179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Terry Kossegi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Francesca Roth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Joanne Persico
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Yassine Azagar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.18
Mitchell Low
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Katie Figgie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Diann Starcke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Eli Stahl
published
3.95
Jonathan Klee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Karyn Sackstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Naomi Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Misha Monticciolo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Christopher Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Fernando Juguera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lisa Newell
published
3.34
Susan Greenberg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.29
Shanon Blue
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yassine Azagar + Shanon Blue27561% games+11.6% vs expected
Mitchell Low + Shanon Blue7557% games+2.0% vs expected
Katie Figgie + Mitchell Low6650% games−2.3% vs expected
Yassine Azagar + Karyn Sackstein2551% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Wolfe + Misha Monticciolo3349% gamesnot enough data
Katie Figgie + Terry Kossegi2341% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Wolfe + Shanon Blue1443% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Klee + Shanon Blue404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terry Kossegi
103W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Francesca Roth
104W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Joanne Persico
58W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
5
Yassine Azagar
187W–87L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.21
4.5
Mitchell Low
276W–157L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Katie Figgie
100W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Diann Starcke
88W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
Eli Stahl
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Jonathan Klee
67W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
Karyn Sackstein
110W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Naomi Daniels
83W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Misha Monticciolo
214W–127L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Christopher Wolfe
85W–104L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Fernando Juguera
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Lisa Newell
193W–122L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
4
Susan Greenberg
106W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
4
Shanon Blue
382W–274L career · 9 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.