Teams

Siri/Jaeger

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
James Jaeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Joseph Siri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Joseph Siri vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Tom Huminski / Charles Leavitt6-2, 6-4
2024-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Andrew Smith / William Hickey6-4, 6-1
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Stephen Blum / Fabio Santos Nallem6-1, 6-3
2024-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Joseph Siri vs David Hubka / Mario Sanchez5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Stephen Blum / Jeremy Harkin6-3, 6-2
2024-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Joseph Siri vs Cory Heisterkamp / Spencer Byrd6-4, 6-3
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Joseph Siri vs Thomas Griffin / Luis Ponce de Leon6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
James Jaeger
41W–18L career
0%3%97%
3.40
3
Joseph Siri
45W–38L career
0%91%9%
2.92

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.