← Search

James Jaeger

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 41W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add James Jaeger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-05-08 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · CHARB-Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · CHARB-Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · CHARB-Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-14 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Majewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-08 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-20 · SHC-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-07-24 · Siri-Stafford Collective · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-03 · Siri-Stafford Collective · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.1%
27W–11L · 62.8% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova