Teams

CP: Chelsea Piers Men's 4.5 40+: Pascale

2025 SCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.5 Men - 1

24 players · average NTRP 4.55 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-28vs TCT:40+ 4.5:PaganoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrent Wiedmer / Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann vs Adrian Louw / John Pagano4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNathan Anderson vs Manu Krishnan7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDarnell Caballes / Pierre-Marie Despontin vs Jeffrey Brozek / Carlos Riollano7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Zobler / Aditya Mukund Subramanian vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-04vs KH:Spinackers:FrankWon 31
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pascale / David Arnett vs Andrew Frank / Scott Patton4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRD Ferman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Gold / Christopher Zobler vs Nils Boenicke / Gregory Vadasdi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAditya Mukund Subramanian / Richard Brail vs Hermann Behrens / Keith Seidman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-12-08vs KH:Spinackers:FrankWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Bailey / RD Ferman vs Scott Patton / Jonathan Crowe7-6, 3-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Arnett / Andrew Finn vs Andrew Frank / Hermann Behrens6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLarry Teitelbaum / Matthew Pascale vs Paul Noto / William Seward6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-24vs KH:Spinackers:FrankWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Gold / Darnell Caballes vs Jonathan Crowe / Scott Patton7-5, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrent Wiedmer / Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann vs Gregory Vadasdi / Andrew Frank6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLarry Teitelbaum / David Lerner vs Hermann Behrens / Keith Seidman6-1, 7-5
2024-11-16vs TCT:40+ 4.5:PaganoWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Bailey / Andrew Finn vs Adrian Louw / Mark Schiller4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNathan Anderson vs Manu Krishnan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Pascale / Chris Montanaro vs Jeffrey Brozek / Juan Amador7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-02vs TCT:40+ 4.5:PaganoWon 40
W#1 DoublesRD Ferman / Peter Bailey vs Rick Lopez / Lawrence Hirsch6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTodd Parker vs Adrian Louw6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Arnett / Matthew Pascale vs Jeffrey Brozek / Adam Robinson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHaydn Palliser / Jeffrey Gold vs Carlos Riollano / Patrick Fraser6-4, 6-3
2024-10-19vs KH:Spinackers:FrankWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Brail / Ted Keating vs Andrew Frank / Nils Boenicke3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNathan Anderson vs Adam Finkelstein6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Bailey / David Mortamais vs Hermann Behrens / Sean Durkin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-27vs TCT:40+ 4.5:PaganoLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Montanaro / Ted Keating vs Lawrence Hirsch / John Pagano5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNathan Anderson vs Manu Krishnan6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrew Finn / Cameron Iraj vs Adrian Louw / Rick Lopez3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Clapp / Matthew Pascale vs Jeffrey Brozek / Patrick Fraser2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:40+ 4.5:Pagano06121229210
2KH:Spinackers:Frank0641939266
3CP: Chelsea Piers Men's 4.5 40+: Pascale0823824242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Slater
published 5
4.48
Nathan Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.43
Pierre-Marie Despontin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Brent Wiedmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Aditya Mukund Subramanian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Cameron Iraj
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Jeffrey Gold
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
David Lerner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andrew Finn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Chris Montanaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
David Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Larry Teitelbaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Christopher Zobler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Brett Clapp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Darnell Caballes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Peter Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
David Mortamais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Haydn Palliser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Pascale
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
RD Ferman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Richard Brail
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ted Keating
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Parker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Gold + Pierre-Marie Despontin14655% games+7.3% vs expected
Brent Wiedmer + Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann9360% games+5.8% vs expected
Brent Wiedmer + Aditya Mukund Subramanian4357% games+1.5% vs expected
David Lerner + Larry Teitelbaum5073% gamesnot enough data
Richard Brail + Christopher Zobler4151% gamesnot enough data
Cameron Iraj + Pierre-Marie Despontin224 matchesnot enough data
Brent Wiedmer + Matthew Pascale224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Pascale + Andrew Finn314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
David Slater
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Anderson
68W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
Pierre-Marie Despontin
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.43
4.5
Brent Wiedmer
39W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
4.42
4.5
Aditya Mukund Subramanian
84W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Cameron Iraj
36W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Jeffrey Gold
67W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
David Lerner
35W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Andrew Finn
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chris Montanaro
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Arnett
27W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Larry Teitelbaum
30W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Christopher Zobler
28W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Ulrich Brandt-Pollmann
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Brett Clapp
4W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Darnell Caballes
66W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Peter Bailey
57W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
David Mortamais
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Haydn Palliser
43W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Pascale
34W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
RD Ferman
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Brail
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Keating
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Parker
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.