Teams

Tampa Palms - A. McKenna

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-06vs FishHawk Matchmakers - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesPat Morris / Brenda Paprocki vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott1-6, 2-6
2023-02-27vs Carrollwood Chaos - B. CooperLost 02
L#1 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Amy Rairigh vs Krista Mills / Johnessa Hern0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKate Walshcalton / Pamela Gonzalez vs Danielle Eichmann / Valerie Carrillo1-6, 5-7
2023-02-20vs Van Dyke Farms - M. HestonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJihea Helme / Jolanta Lagowski vs Stephanie van Brocklin / MARY HESTON2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Pamela Woodham vs Jen Bradley / Ellie Dahl6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKate Walshcalton / Brenda Paprocki vs Shari Mastria / Dorothy Flair6-4, 6-3
2023-02-06vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesPat Morris / Cindy Sparks vs Anne Marie Lennox / Jennifer Duglin3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Kate Walshcalton vs Emelia Flitman / Kelly Machonis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-30vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterSplit 11
L#2 SinglesPat Morris vs Crystal Shanique Bethel6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHyun Kim / Amy Rairigh vs Cheri Snyder / Courtney Craig6-4, 6-2
2023-01-23vs Westchase - P. HayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJihea Helme / Jolanta Lagowski vs Natalie Kuhn / Nicole Tamulski5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Pat Morris vs Pamela Hayes / Carmen Fiorito6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAnne McKenna / Pat Morris vs Sejal Alvarez / Nicole Borel-Saladin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKate Walshcalton / Cindy Sparks vs Lauren Erickson / Jenni Carroll2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Thao Pham
published
3.02
Cille Williams
published 3
2.96
Hyun Kim
published
2.71
Amy Rairigh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.61
Pamela Woodham
published
2.56
Jihea Helme
published
2.55
Kate Walshcalton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.41
Pamela Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
2.29
Pat Morris
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Sparks + Pat Morris4744% gamesnot enough data
Amy Rairigh + Jolanta Lagowski3545% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Sparks + Pamela Gonzalez1543% gamesnot enough data
Pat Morris + Pamela Gonzalez0623% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Jolanta Lagowski2446% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Amy Rairigh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thao Pham
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3
Cille Williams
62W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Hyun Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Pamela Woodham
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kate Walshcalton
32W–64L career · 10 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Pamela Gonzalez
26W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.41
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.33
Pat Morris
31W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.