Teams

KY/LEX/Brester-Ross

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over MIXED LEXINGTON · 4.0 ADULT MIXED

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-03vs KY/LEX/SPARKSLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Hutchens / Jennifer Alexander vs Billy Sparks Jr / Grace McGonigle1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kennedy / Patti Stanton vs Kristin Coffey / Robert Rosenberg0-6, 3-6
2024-07-25vs KY/LEX/Ernst 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Turner / Hiroko Nakata vs Rick Harris / Ann Boone2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Ross / Patti Stanton vs Bradley Lewis / Jennifer Ernst6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-25vs KY/LEX/Ernst 4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Bay / Patti Stanton vs Rick Prior / Ann Boone3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Kennedy / Laura Kennoy vs Dave Messner / Brandi Simon6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Alexander / Casey Hutchens vs Mike Wilson / Heather Thompson6-3, 7-5
2024-07-21vs KY/LEX/CassagneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoey Mckinney / Hiroko Nakata vs William McCubbin / Elisabeth Hixson0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBenny Evans / Patti Stanton vs Chris Cassagne / Marisol Valles1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Fields / Leslie Russ vs David Ferretti / Michele Ravencraft5-7, 3-6
2024-07-10vs KY/LEX/SPARKSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCasey Hutchens / Jennifer Alexander vs Kristin Coffey / Robert Rosenberg2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Ross / Hiroko Nakata vs Sarah Delahanty / Sameer Desai6-3, 6-4
2024-06-28vs KY/LEX/CassagneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Ross / Hiroko Nakata vs Chris Cassagne / Sandra Wickline3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoey Mckinney / Leslie Russ vs Carlos Verdecchia / Rhonda Miller3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCasey Hutchens / Laura Kennoy vs David Ferretti / Lana Stephens1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-18vs KY/LEX/SPARKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesHiroko Nakata / Michael Kennedy vs Kristin Coffey / Tommy Green3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Hutchens / Jennifer Alexander vs Sarah Delahanty / Jonathan Profitt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoe Ross / Erin Brester vs Nicole Norfleet / Matthew Riddell6-4, 6-4
2024-06-12vs KY/LEX/Ernst 4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Ross / Erin Brester vs Ileana Contreras / Bradley Lewis3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCamille Morrow / Nathan Bay vs Dave Messner / Brandi Simon7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoey Mckinney / Hiroko Nakata vs Angie Cobb / Richard Lane6-4, 6-1
2024-06-05vs KY/LEX/CassagneLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Ross / Erin Brester vs Elisabeth Hixson / Chris Cassagne5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Bay / Hiroko Nakata vs Scott Gould / Lana Stephens5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Russ / David Fields vs Rhonda Miller / Brian Lauder3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 ADULT MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Cassagne7222515201
2KY/LEX/Brester-Ross3681940288
3KY/LEX/Ernst 4.01862144288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Camille Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Hiroko Nakata
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.65
Leslie Russ
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Joey Mckinney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Benny Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Joe Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Erin Brester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Laura Kennoy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Casey Hutchens
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brooks Lundy
published 3.5
2.95
Patti Stanton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nathan Bay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Ross + Erin Brester123 matchesnot enough data
Joe Ross + Hiroko Nakata213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Morrow
54W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Hiroko Nakata
75W–50L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Leslie Russ
39W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Joey Mckinney
50W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Benny Evans
31W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
Joe Ross
88W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Erin Brester
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Laura Kennoy
43W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Casey Hutchens
56W–47L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Brooks Lundy
3W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Stanton
17W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Nathan Bay
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.