Teams

Beshears/Susong 55+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-19vs Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Payne / Mary Fowler vs Martha Cox / Kathryn Michaud4-6, 6-7
2022-08-22vs Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Fowler / Susan Payne vs Vickie Degges / Darci Gold6-3, 6-2
2022-08-15vs Majestic 55+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Atchison / Mary Fowler vs Kimberly Eberhard / Diane Majestic3-6, 2-6
2022-08-08vs Berreth 55+ 7.5WNLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Fowler / Susan Payne vs Sallye Parker / Marsha Tice2-6, 5-7
2022-08-01vs Chance/Dollar 55+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Payne / Mary Fowler vs Martha Cox / Libby Strickland7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Lynn Jacoby
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.32
Mary Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Mary Ann Nixon
published
3.29
Debbie Shiflet
published 3.5
3.29
Nancy McNeill
published
3.19
Anne Thornton
published 3.5
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
3.06
Jody Susong
published
3.00
Janis Beshears
published
2.92
Cindy McElreath
published 3.5
2.75
Susan Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Fowler + Mary Ann Nixon1738% gamesnot enough data
Janis Beshears + Jody Susong2443% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Jody Susong123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Nixon + Gwenda Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Janis Beshears033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Shiflet + Cindy McElreath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Jacoby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Mary Fowler
67W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.32
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–47L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.32
3.5
Debbie Shiflet
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Nancy McNeill
24W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne Thornton
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jody Susong
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
Janis Beshears
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Cindy McElreath
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Susan Payne
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.