Teams

LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pm

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s

9 players · average NTRP 2.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-03vs LREM-Emlong/Russell/LNRSCLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Peeler / Baxter Price vs Ryan Neufeld / Scott Boyles6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith MacVean / Kendall Reische vs David Thome / Mark Hamm0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKenny Hastings / Steve Riddle vs Neil McLean / Sam Russell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-20vs LMSI-Siler/JettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesBaxter Price / David Peeler vs David Rosselli / Troy Fitzsimmons6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKendall Reische / Keith MacVean vs David Wagner / Ty Niblack6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBill Shehane / Kenny Hastings vs Alan Henderson / Erik Kopco5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-13vs LREM-Emlong/Russell/LNRSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBaxter Price / David Peeler vs Sam Russell / Ryan Neufeld6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Riddle / Gian Sarolli vs Brian Jenkins / Scott Boyles1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTom Cobb / Kenny Hastings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
David Peeler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Bill Shehane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Keith MacVean
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Larry Townley
published 3
2.46
John Lombard
published
2.41
Kendall Reische
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Baxter Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Gian Sarolli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Kenny Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith MacVean + Baxter Price4842% games+6.6% vs expected
Larry Townley + Baxter Price1731% gamesnot enough data
Baxter Price + David Peeler3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Peeler
44W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Bill Shehane
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Keith MacVean
34W–89L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Larry Townley
22W–70L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
John Lombard
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kendall Reische
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Baxter Price
44W–105L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Gian Sarolli
22W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Kenny Hastings
22W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.