Teams

CTL40/Layden/WWD

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - USTA · 40 & Over Mixed 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Lisa Dahlquist
published
3.54
Laura Shwedo
published
3.52
Brian Pool
published 3.5
3.46
Jim Bigham
published
3.40
Will Kuhne
published
3.31
Jay Cleary
published
3.29
Wyndi Green
published
Amy Bigham
published 3.5
3.24
Alexander McDonald
published 3.5
3.21
Laurie Pool
published
3.21
Shannon Martin
published
3.15
Patrick Layden
published
3.14
Carol Ivey
published 3.5
3.11
Kerry Ford
published
3.01
David Ford
published 3
2.99
Lentz Ivey
published
2.85
Gail Harrison
published 3
Bhavna Vasudeva
published 3
Paul Brown
published
Ron Fuerst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Pool + Brian Pool6553% games+4.4% vs expected
Kerry Ford + David Ford4448% games−11.6% vs expected
Lentz Ivey + Carol Ivey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Dahlquist
60W–35L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Laura Shwedo
105W–81L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Brian Pool
125W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jim Bigham
91W–84L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
Will Kuhne
29W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Jay Cleary
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Wyndi Green
114W–109L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Bigham
37W–74L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Alexander McDonald
65W–59L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Laurie Pool
104W–128L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Shannon Martin
54W–66L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Patrick Layden
130W–137L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Carol Ivey
23W–42L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kerry Ford
134W–78L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
David Ford
83W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lentz Ivey
12W–42L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Gail Harrison
137W–141L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Bhavna Vasudeva
23W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Brown
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Fuerst
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.