Teams

Corpus-Not My Fault

2025 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 4.0 Flight

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-16vs Lubbock-Buddy VolleyLost 23
L#1 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Monica Salazar vs Ginger Wayland / Angela Trevithick1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNathalie Oropeza vs Anna Spangler3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristy Hardcastle / Sarah Sivils vs Tiffany Fioroni / Lydia Williams6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalia Delatte vs Raegan Boren6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Loveland / Saifon Murray vs Shaunna Jensen / Laura Kopytkiewicz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-15vs Houston-AceAce BabyLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristy Hardcastle / Sarah Stevens vs Yolanda Levingston / Sheri Brown6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSaifon Murray vs MALENA Cayo0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Cromwell / Monica Salazar vs Anna Arante / Maria Esteves1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNatalia Delatte vs Maria Garcia-Mireles2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Loveland / Raquel Powers vs Adriana Daza / Krista Thompson0-6, 5-7
2025-08-15vs Waco-Bailey VarsityWon 32
W#1 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Monica Salazar vs Rhonda Worsham / Tammy Bray6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBriana Torres vs Alice Lu1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathalie Oropeza / Jennifer Talackine vs Durette Cawood / Kristi Phillips1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNatalia Delatte vs Olga Ayvazyan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Cromwell / Michelle Shircliffe vs Angela Bailey / Shana Jeter6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Briana Torres
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Sarah Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Natalia Delatte
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Nathalie Oropeza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Kristy Hardcastle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Raquel Powers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Monica Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Michelle Shircliffe
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Sarah Sivils
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Elizabeth Cromwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Victoria Allen
published
3.26
Elizabeth Loveland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jennifer Talackine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Maria Guerra
published
2.65
Aurora Robles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Saifon Murray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Talackine + Nathalie Oropeza033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Briana Torres
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Sarah Stevens
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Natalia Delatte
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Nathalie Oropeza
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kristy Hardcastle
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Raquel Powers
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Monica Salazar
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Michelle Shircliffe
45W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Sarah Sivils
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Elizabeth Cromwell
26W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Victoria Allen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Elizabeth Loveland
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jennifer Talackine
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Maria Guerra
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Saifon Murray
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.