Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CM9.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 9.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-17vs GOLDMAN TC CM9.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesVarun Desai / Eric Ritter vs Ryan Qiu / Jules Wada6-4, 6-3
2024-10-06vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CM9.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesVarun Desai / Viraj Degaonkar vs Federico Innocenti / Paul Sampognaro6-3, 6-4
2024-09-29vs OLYMPIC CM9.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesVarun Desai / Sam Behbehani vs Paul Giraud / Jesse Levitin3-6, 1-6
2024-09-17vs OLYMPIC CM9.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesVarun Desai / Tri Tran vs David Hultman / Alexander Buckley2-6, 3-6
2024-09-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesVarun Desai / Viraj Degaonkar vs Tyler Zhang / Kevin Haugh6-1, 6-2
2024-09-03vs GOLDMAN TC CM9.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesVarun Desai / Vinh Ngo vs John Weiler / Austin Graham6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-08-29vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CM9.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesTri Tran / Varun Desai vs Martin Montes / Matthew Fitzburgh6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Alexander Groth
published 5
4.76
Varun Desai
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 5
4.60
Viraj Degaonkar
published
4.36
Sam Behbehani
published
4.34
Eric Ritter
published
4.26
Michael Franchi
published
4.23
Taylor T Leese
published
4.18
Vinh Ngo
published
4.16
Ranjit Deshpande
published
4.16
Rob Lamour
published
4.04
Shahand Esmaeili
published
3.84
Kelemen Papp
published
Jonathan Ng
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexander Groth
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Varun Desai
51W–27L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.76
Viraj Degaonkar
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
Sam Behbehani
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.36
Eric Ritter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Michael Franchi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Ruiz Chiu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taylor T Leese
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Vinh Ngo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Ranjit Deshpande
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Rob Lamour
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Shahand Esmaeili
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Kelemen Papp
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Jonathan Ng
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.