Teams

Hopkins - Serve Aces

2024 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Men · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-14vs Tiong - CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesPete Bianchini / Tim Bowes vs Gaurav Chikara / David Parks5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-12vs Tiong - CourtmastersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / John Murray vs Gaurav Chikara / Abhilash Kaithavelil6-4, 6-3
2024-07-01vs Tiong - CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Eric Hopkins vs Abhilash Kaithavelil / Anil Khanna6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS vs Simon Storm / Michael Porturica4-6, 1-6
2024-06-17vs Tiong - CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesDouglas Thede / Jamie Holloman vs Gaurav Chikara / Michael Porturica6-7, 5-5
L#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs Siva Jagadeesan0-6, 2-6
2024-06-09vs Tiong - CourtmastersWon 20
W#1 DoublesDouglas Thede / Jamie Holloman vs Edwin Donovan / Michael Porturica6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / John Murray vs Wallace Higginbotham / Abhilash Kaithavelil6-3, 6-2
2024-05-31vs Tiong - CourtmastersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Thede / Jamie Holloman vs Edwin Donovan / Allen Amir Parvizian6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.35
Jamie Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Douglas Thede
published 3.5
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.72
Rich Vinnacombe
published
2.69
Jim Craig
published
2.63
Paul Juergensen
published
2.60
Samuel Meadema
published
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
2.09
Christopher Wulff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Hopkins + Jamie Holloman4165% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Jamie Holloman
62W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Douglas Thede
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Rich Vinnacombe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Paul Juergensen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
Samuel Meadema
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Wulff
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.