Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-29vs Leonard - RS HardLost 23
W#1 DoublesTammie Coco / Regina Dixon vs Kiley Leonard / Olivia Johnson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMorgan Craft vs Amatul Bean2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs PATRICIA Ghiglino / Lindsey Chadbourne4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSavannah Wilson vs Reghan Robinson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Menear / Alita Fisher vs Monika Greene / Lisa Streete7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Lochas - RS HardLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Jill Wilson vs Jacqueline Pommerening / Stacy Wilks4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSavannah Wilson vs Nikki Bucco2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlita Fisher / Michelle Patterson vs Haley Allen / Wendi Best7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMorgan Craft vs Heather Ondra6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRegina Dixon / Tammie Coco vs Katie Gross / Wendy McIntosh Holmes6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Tammie Coco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Morgan Craft
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Jill Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Tonya Chase
published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
published
Alita Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Regina Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Margaret Menear
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Savannah Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Menear + Jill Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammie Coco
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Morgan Craft
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Tonya Chase
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alita Fisher
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Regina Dixon
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Margaret Menear
18W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.