Teams

SATL40/TriLevel/JMiller

40 & Over Tri-Level · 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-20vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrace Coleman / Christi Brown vs Katherine Quinney / Kerry Schwanz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJamie Miller / Kathryn Rountree vs Rene Smith / Christen Dileonardo6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesNatalie Barry / Yelena Shpakovskiy vs Michele Singleton / Kimberly Hale6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Mason / Grace Coleman vs Kimberly Faust / Martha Lee6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Waltz / Natalie Barry vs Amy Ogiba / Rhett Ambrite6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Miller / Yelena Shpakovskiy vs Corbin Wimberly / Corene Kronsberg6-4, 6-3
2025-09-19vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Mason / Christi Brown vs Katherine Quinney / Natalie Rogers3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeg Clayton / Natalie Barry vs Christen Dileonardo / Rene Smith6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJamie Miller / Yelena Shpakovskiy vs Kimberly Hale / Allison DeVaux3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-19vs SC 4.5-3.5 Women 40 & Over (Faust)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Coleman / Charlotte Mason vs Lisa Duckworth / Sara Youngner4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMeg Clayton / Leslie Waltz vs Lindsey Johnson / Amy Ogiba4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKathryn Rountree / Yelena Shpakovskiy vs Tammy Trenholm / Corbin Wimberly5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Charlotte Mason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Amy Austin
published 4
3.68
Meg Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Grace Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kathryn Rountree
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Leslie Waltz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Natalie Barry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Miller
published
Yelena Shpakovskiy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Waltz + Kathryn Rountree7453% games+0.9% vs expected
Charlotte Mason + Grace Coleman3446% games−16.3% vs expected
Jamie Miller + Yelena Shpakovskiy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlotte Mason
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Amy Austin
40W–32L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Meg Clayton
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Grace Coleman
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68
Kathryn Rountree
44W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Leslie Waltz
57W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Natalie Barry
27W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jamie Miller
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yelena Shpakovskiy
31W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.