Teams

Yadkin/McInteer/18+3.5

2022 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women-Wednesday (night)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-04vs Yadkin/Haynes/18+3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Lowman / Elyssa Millard vs Eva Owens / Deborah Foster6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-20vs Yadkin/Peters/18+3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesElyssa Millard / Adele Roberts vs Carrie Haberkost / Erika Zimmerman6-4, 6-3
2022-04-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Elyssa Millard vs Sherri Lawson Clark / Pamela Robinson6-0, 6-3
2022-04-06vs Yadkin/Allen-Saunders/FCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Elyssa Millard vs Lee Saunders / Brooke Rosenberg6-3, 6-4
2022-03-30vs Yadkin/Haynes/18+3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Melaney Gee6-7, 1-6
2022-03-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesElyssa Millard vs Taylor Norman6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women-Wednesday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.66
Kimberly Busse
published
3.58
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
published
3.46
Caroline Gallagher
published 3.5
3.43
Lindsay Reynolds
published
3.25
Adele Roberts
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Lowman
published
3.18
Elyssa Millard
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Amber Trbonja
published 3.5
3.03
Paige Reilly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Gallagher + Meghan de Young4261% games+1.9% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Amber Trbonja1733% games−4.4% vs expected
Meghan de Young + Clarissa Tatum314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Kimberly Busse
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
62W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.58
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Gallagher
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Lindsay Reynolds
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Dudley Commander Burkhalter
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Adele Roberts
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Linda Lowman
43W–46L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elyssa Millard
65W–78L career · 10 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amber Trbonja
11W–34L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Paige Reilly
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.