Teams

Williams Y - Muehl

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women ESL Fall · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Aura Bernal vs Karin Fletcher / JUDITH DEVRIES6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMari Hinds / Mani Prieto vs Teresa Linck / Lisa Goodrich2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Atkins / Jeralyn Forcier vs Grace Costello / Wenying Xu6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesJulie van Voorhis / Aura Bernal vs Karin Fletcher / JUDITH DEVRIES6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Mani Prieto vs Teresa Linck / Ellen Dyal3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie van Voorhis / Karen Meyer vs Eileen Edsall / Lisa Goodrich6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMari Hinds / Reiko Sheridan vs Teresa Linck / Ellen Dyal2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Atkins / Arlene Muehl vs Danette Jarriel / Donna Wilson7-6, 7-5
W#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Michelle Reid vs Grace Costello / Wenying Xu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Meyer / Julie van Voorhis vs Teresa Linck / Danette Jarriel4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKelly Atkins / Jeralyn Forcier vs Debbie Davis / Michelle Jahn6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArlene Muehl / Jeralyn Forcier vs Teresa Linck / Debbie Davis6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAura Bernal / Julie van Voorhis vs Michelle Jahn / Donna Wilson6-1, 7-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Michelle Reid vs Ellen Dyal / Teresa Linck4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAura Bernal / Julie van Voorhis vs Michelle Jahn / Danette Jarriel6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Cecilia Collins
published 4.5
3.91
Cynthia Haines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Julie van Voorhis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Virginia Watson
published
3.79
Kelly Atkins
published
3.78
Jeralyn Forcier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Donna Bush
published
3.77
Pamela Alpert
published
3.75
Michelle Reid
published
3.60
Mari Hinds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Jacqueline Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mani Prieto
published
3.45
Arlene Muehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Aura Bernal
published 3.5
3.19
Svetlana Mityul
published
3.14
Karen Meyer
published
Reiko Sheridan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Reid + Cynthia Haines4547% games−2.0% vs expected
Michelle Reid + Mani Prieto213 matchesnot enough data
Mari Hinds + Jeralyn Forcier123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Bush + Pamela Alpert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cecilia Collins
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4
Cynthia Haines
127W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Julie van Voorhis
45W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
Virginia Watson
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Kelly Atkins
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Jeralyn Forcier
57W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Donna Bush
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Pamela Alpert
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Michelle Reid
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Mari Hinds
56W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Jacqueline Harris
46W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Mani Prieto
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
3.5
Arlene Muehl
77W–66L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Svetlana Mityul
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Karen Meyer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Reiko Sheridan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.