Teams

Whitfield/18/4.0/M/BREC

2026 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (18&O) Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Sayger
published 4
3.54
Hunter Gilbert
published
3.50
Lyndon Wilbert
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Daniel Lockwood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.45
William Benton
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.42
Andrew Muhl
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.38
Marshall LaMoyne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
Connor Barney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Wilbert Whitfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Connor Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Eric Gravois
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dylan Robicheaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Muhl + Marshall LaMoyne4166% games+15.0% vs expected
Lyndon Wilbert + Marshall LaMoyne213 matchesnot enough data
Connor Barney + Connor Gonzales033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Sayger
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hunter Gilbert
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Lyndon Wilbert
32W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Lockwood
16W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
William Benton
9W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Andrew Muhl
26W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Marshall LaMoyne
19W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Connor Barney
1W–24L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Wilbert Whitfield
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.97
3.5
Connor Gonzales
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Eric Gravois
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Dylan Robicheaux
0W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.