Teams

BP-Eichelberger

2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Spring · Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-13vs SATA/Marc FrischerWon 32
W#1 DoublesDerwin Roland / James Hutto vs Francisco VAldez / Juan Avendano6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndy White vs Adam Greer2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Eichelberger / Sherwood Silliman vs Chad Brooks / Brad Sinoff6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAmith Kumar Sharma vs Kevin Richmond7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBarry Hill / Billy Steinhauser vs Joel Solomon / Kenneth Smith2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sherwood Silliman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Derwin Roland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Arnold Jackson
published 3.5
3.26
Jeffrey Graham
published
Amith Kumar Sharma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Clayton Boyer
published 3.5
3.23
Billy Steinhauser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Kevin Eichelberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Andy White
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.11
Barry Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
James Hutto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Eichelberger + Sherwood Silliman4453% games−0.3% vs expected
Barry Hill + Arnold Jackson1640% games−11.1% vs expected
Barry Hill + Billy Steinhauser044 matchesnot enough data
Derwin Roland + Kevin Eichelberger044 matchesnot enough data
Billy Steinhauser + Sherwood Silliman404 matchesnot enough data
Barry Hill + Sherwood Silliman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherwood Silliman
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Derwin Roland
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Arnold Jackson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jeffrey Graham
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Amith Kumar Sharma
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Clayton Boyer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Billy Steinhauser
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kevin Eichelberger
21W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Andy White
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Barry Hill
9W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
James Hutto
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.