Teams

WPAFB-Coy

2024 OH OV WINTER Tri Level · WINTER Tri Level Men 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-21vs QRRC-Merkle/AguileraLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonovan Christman / Jonathan Scherquist vs Alexander Boardman / Reid Wynkoop3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJaspreet Singh / Matthew Chmiel vs Adam Beiersdorfer / Andrew Schulz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Graham / Jim Liu vs Rodolfo Aguilera / Luke Trubee3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-09vs QRRC-Merkle/AguileraLost 12
L#1 DoublesJonathan Scherquist / Emanuel Papp vs Jason Merkle / Enrico Ferri3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Sigler / Jaspreet Singh vs Aaron Wolters / Dane Ranney3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Liu / Joseph Graham vs Luke Trubee / Keith Boroczk6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-17vs QRRC-Merkle/AguileraWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonovan Christman / Jonathan Scherquist vs Reid Wynkoop / Alexander Boardman2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJaspreet Singh / Isaac Cade vs Dane Ranney / Jack Smallwood4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Sigler / Jim Liu vs Nicholas Quiroz / Rodolfo Aguilera6-1, 6-4
2024-02-03vs QRRC-Merkle/AguileraWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonovan Christman / Jonathan Scherquist vs Jason Merkle / Enrico Ferri7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Chmiel / Christopher Sigler vs Chris Schlater / Rodolfo Aguilera4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoseph Graham / Jim Liu vs Luke Trubee / Nicholas Quiroz6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WINTER Tri Level Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC-Merkle/Aguilera4210818136
2WPAFB-Coy2461227195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Donovan Christman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.11
Jonathan Scherquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Emanuel Papp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Isaac Cade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Christopher Sigler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Jim Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Douglas Coy
published 3
Matthew Chmiel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donovan Christman + Jonathan Scherquist123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Donovan Christman
112W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.58
Jonathan Scherquist
42W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Emanuel Papp
41W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Isaac Cade
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Sigler
37W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jim Liu
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3
Douglas Coy
44W–69L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
2.63
Matthew Chmiel
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.