Teams

It Doesn't Add Up

2022 Charlottesville Combo · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-13vs ACACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMark Hensien / Rene Roy vs Mark Ehlers / Paul Lorenzo0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Emery / Edward Lis vs Derek Frazier / Christopher Raupp6-2, 6-2
2022-09-10vs ACACWon 10
W#2 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Gregory Taeger vs Paul Lorenzo / Henry Hickman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-27vs ACACWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Russell Ridings vs Henry Clifford III / Alex de Montbel6-3, 7-5
2022-08-24vs ACACLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Lis / Alexander Boucher vs William Manning / Derek Frazier6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-20vs ACACWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Russell Ridings vs John Goodrich / Paul Lorenzo6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Manalich / Rene Roy vs Henry Hickman / Gregory Parrish6-3, 7-5
2022-08-13vs ACACWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Russell Ridings vs Paul Lorenzo / Derek Frazier6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Alexander Boucher vs John Goodrich / Christopher Raupp6-0, 6-2
2022-08-06vs ACACWon 10
W#2 DoublesRussell Ridings / Rene Roy vs Henry Clifford III / Alex de Montbel6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Lorenzo Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Ben Jorgensen
published 4
3.74
Patrick Manalich
published
3.60
Melvin Herndon
published
3.58
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.56
Russell Ridings
published 4
3.55
Rene Roy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Edward Lis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Robert Emery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rene Roy + Edward Lis121949% games−0.2% vs expected
Rene Roy + Benjamin Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Ben Jorgensen + Edward Lis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lorenzo Davis
113W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Ben Jorgensen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Patrick Manalich
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Melvin Herndon
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Russell Ridings
76W–75L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Edward Lis
136W–133L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Robert Emery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.