Teams

FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.32 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 7 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Square Park
Sep 14 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Square Park
Sep 21 9:30 AM
Park Road Park
Sep 28 9:30 AM
Chestnut Square Park
Oct 5 9:30 AM
vs
Chestnut Square Park
2026-08-26vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDanna Jean Pompeo / Sydney Cohen vs Ashley Emison / Annaliese Anderson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Fumiyo Ono vs Wendy Jourdan / Margaux Karagosian6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNily Willis / Tricia Green vs Alyssa Salette / Lindsey Kerr6-1, 6-2
2026-08-24vs MMiller (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Danna Jean Pompeo vs Katherine Costello / Mary Holland0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Bach / Kimberly Hoben vs Carrie Fisher / Emily McEwen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Carroll / Liz Misenheimer vs Meg Perry / Mallory Miller6-7, 5-7
2026-08-17vs LGignac (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Daniels-Lynch / Danna Jean Pompeo vs Rosie Rogers / Carrie Dunham6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Kristin Verrill vs Suzannah Hicks / Liz Rabidou6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNily Willis / Fumiyo Ono vs Wendy Solomon / Lindy Gignac6-1, 6-1
2026-08-10vs HPhelps (Bridgehampton)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKrista Reardon / Shannon Horton vs Roxanne Kastein / Heather Hope6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Verrill / Liz Misenheimer vs HEATHER PHELPS / Allison Mitchell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSydney Cohen / Nily Willis vs Candace MacIntyre / Ashley Bowles3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBasinger (CSRC)2060129
2FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park)2051332
3JBlack (Queens)2051452
4CKahm/ASherrill (Queens)2042550
5MMiller (Queens)1021222
6DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road)1021223
7WParker (Queens)1142445
8JGardiner (OPRC)1142564
9AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC)1133751
10WJourdan (PPRSC)1124960
11HPhelps (Bridgehampton)0224954
12KCrosby/KMartin (Sardis)02151065
13AStein (Ballantyne CC)02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Amy Guear
published 4.5
4.18
Krista Reardon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Karen Daniels-Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Heather Hiteshew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Kristin Verrill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Fumiyo Ono
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Diane Bach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Danna Jean Pompeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Liz Misenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Kimberly Hoben
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Nily Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Erin Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Shannon Horton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sydney Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tricia Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Misenheimer + Kristin Verrill9360% games+6.2% vs expected
Liz Misenheimer + Fumiyo Ono12657% games−0.8% vs expected
Heather Hiteshew + Kristin Verrill2548% games−4.8% vs expected
Krista Reardon + Amy Guear5354% games−11.5% vs expected
Liz Misenheimer + Nily Willis5549% gamesnot enough data
Krista Reardon + Kristin Verrill5456% gamesnot enough data
Karen Daniels-Lynch + Fumiyo Ono6350% gamesnot enough data
Krista Reardon + Kimberly Hoben5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Guear
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Krista Reardon
131W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Karen Daniels-Lynch
139W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Heather Hiteshew
114W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Kristin Verrill
95W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Fumiyo Ono
100W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Diane Bach
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
4
Danna Jean Pompeo
40W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Liz Misenheimer
117W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Kimberly Hoben
56W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Erin Carroll
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.69
Shannon Horton
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
Sydney Cohen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tricia Green
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.