Teams

Hamrick-Bear Pen

2026 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Powers / Erin Herbison vs Stephanie Farris / Beth Joel0-6, 3-6
2026-04-30vs Myers/Shannon/Aylward-CCCLost 14
L#1 DoublesMeredith Etheridge / Amee West vs Misty Moseley / Maribeth Crews4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Claire Kovac vs Taylor Ward2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHaley Hamrick / Lauren Brocato vs Samantha Myers / Teresa Reed7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesErin Herbison vs Kelsey Spradling1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMikki Respess / Katie Boykin vs Whitney Morgan / Kristen Crow4-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs Myers/Shannon/Aylward-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Howard / Erin Herbison vs Teresa Reed / Jenifer Davidson3-6, 5-7
2026-04-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Herbison / Sarah Howard vs Madalyne Wolfe Johnson / Shelby Ballinger1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Wright
published 3
2.64
Hannah Claire Kovac
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Lauren Brocato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Mikki Respess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Katie Boykin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Erin Herbison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.44
Haley Hamrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Allison Brady
published 3
2.40
Amee West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Erinn Grady
published
Meredith Etheridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Riley-clark Rocconi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Brocato + Haley Hamrick4348% games+5.1% vs expected
Erin Herbison + Hannah Claire Kovac303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Wright
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hannah Claire Kovac
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%17%83%
2.64
Lauren Brocato
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%22%78%
2.61
Mikki Respess
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Katie Boykin
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Erin Herbison
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Haley Hamrick
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Allison Brady
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Amee West
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
Erinn Grady
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Etheridge
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Riley-clark Rocconi
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.