Teams

St. Martin-Mathews

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Women 5.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-09-30vs Swetman TOCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Purvis / Stephanie Chapman vs Sara Kennedy / Holly French6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRoshelle Pratt / Stephenie Baker vs Tara Mitchell / Schyler St Amant6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesApril Bostwick / Suzanne DAQUILA vs Lindsey OConnell / Caitlyn Chapman Akers1-6, 0-6
2025-09-29vs DIAMONDHEAD - PowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Lauren Purvis vs Karen Wilkerson / Christina Milner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Chapman / Roshelle Pratt vs Minerva Ixtepan / Eliza Easton7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesApril Bostwick / Suzanne DAQUILA vs Rebecca Powell / Keelia Bienemy2-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs Gartman - BiloxiLost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Stephanie Chapman vs Melissa Gartman / Samantha Benson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTracey Mathews / Suzanne DAQUILA vs Jennifer Mitchell / Cassidy Owens1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoshelle Pratt / Stephenie Baker vs Janet Blythe / Presley Owens2-6, 4-6
2025-09-08vs Swetman TOCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Purvis / Julie Cwikla vs Kara Blevins / Meagan Baskin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Mathews / Jo Anne Besselievre vs Lindsey OConnell / Kelly Pilger1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Gibson / April Bostwick vs Tara Mitchell / Caitlyn Chapman Akers4-6, 1-6
2025-08-27vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 5.5 WOMENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Purvis / Suzanne DAQUILA vs Stacey Rishel / Tyler Ash6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Chapman / Jo Anne Besselievre vs Whitney Sumrall / Claire Hanson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTracey Mathews / April Bostwick vs Donna Matthews / Annabella Matthews3-6, 6-7
2025-08-25vs Buckley BBTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Chapman / Lauren Purvis vs Amy Knight / Rachel Gillenwater6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Stephenie Baker vs Hope White / Tina Murray6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTracey Mathews / Brooke Gibson vs Marlo Stewart / Pam Berdine7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-18vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 5.5 WOMENWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Chapman / Lauren Purvis vs Stacey Rishel / Claire Hanson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Stephenie Baker vs Donna Matthews / Tyler Ash6-0, 6-2
2025-08-14vs Gartman - BiloxiLost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Stephanie Chapman vs Jennifer Mitchell / Kelly Robinson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Purvis / Suzanne DAQUILA vs Sabine Pierre / Catherine Wood3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracey Mathews / Stephenie Baker vs Rebecca Atchison / Cassidy Owens2-6, 4-6
2025-08-11vs Buckley BBTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrooke Gibson / Tracey Mathews vs Elan Buckley / Tina Murray0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJo Anne Besselievre / Lauren Purvis vs Amy Knight / Ann Strange6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne DAQUILA / Stephanie Chapman vs Marlo Stewart / Dana Delvescovo6-0, 6-2
2025-08-06vs DIAMONDHEAD - PowellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephenie Baker / Tracey Mathews vs Leigh Ann Reynolds / Christina Milner0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Purvis / Stephanie Chapman vs Rebecca Powell / Donna Brightman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Jo Anne Besselievre
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.63
Lauren Purvis
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.40
Stephenie Baker
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
2.40
Suzanne DAQUILA
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.96
April Bostwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.86
Tracey Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Julie Cwikla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roshelle Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephenie Baker + Tracey Mathews2342% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne DAQUILA + April Bostwick033 matchesnot enough data
Stephenie Baker + Jo Anne Besselievre213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jo Anne Besselievre
26W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
Lauren Purvis
16W–14L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.63
Stephenie Baker
54W–55L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Suzanne DAQUILA
9W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
April Bostwick
0W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Tracey Mathews
9W–31L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Julie Cwikla
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roshelle Pratt
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.