← Teams

MAC-Leedy/Davis

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Susie Jansky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Rico McIver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Peg McClendon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Laney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Nancy Williams
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2021-11-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTerri Gotcher / Janae Pyle vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Traci Laurent6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDella Shanley / Nancy Williams vs Wendy Weddle / Stacey Burkhart7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Murphy / Gretchen Wagner vs Heather Selis / Lori Vranizan6-2, 6-2
2021-11-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Rico McIver vs Sarah Bradley / Barbara Hart6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Williams / Carolyn Bachhuber vs Christina Gibson / Patty Mamula6-2, 6-2
2021-10-30Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTerri Gotcher / Susie Jansky vs Julie Bradford / Kathleen Murrin7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulia Hall / Rico McIver vs Anna Boyarshinova / Sandra Ellis6-1, 7-5
2021-10-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Nancy Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Traci Laurent / Wendy Weddle7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusie Jansky / Della Shanley vs Susan Hope / Kelly Norling1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Laney / Peg McClendon vs Mary Logsdon / Heather Selis7-5, 6-4
2021-10-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Laney / Peg McClendon vs Sandy Swift / Julie Bradford0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Gina Ariosa / Bernadette Lisac6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Della Shanley vs Denise Angel / Mary Beth Thomsen7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Bachhuber / Catherine Leedy vs Noriko Dozono / Shella Razon-Lumetta6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRico McIver / Gretchen Wagner vs Betsy Henningsen / Sheri Schipporeit6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-09-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Sarah Bradley / Julia Rea6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Laney / Peg McClendon vs Marianne Conroy / Gretchen Dumestre6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Barbara Hart / Frederique Lavios6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Rico McIver
44W–33L career
8%91%1%
3.20
3.5
Peg McClendon
54W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Laura Laney
59W–48L career
22%78%0%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3.5
Nancy Williams
59W–52L career
59%41%0%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.