Teams

Jussely/ Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-14vs LaBonia/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Jussely / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs James Latham / Austin Wood6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJean-Francois Lejeune / Arun Sashidharan vs Winston Margaritis / David Patterson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Freddy Ojeda
published
3.80
Ryan Murray
published
3.79
Peyton Neal
published
3.60
Brandon Brackett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Ramon Cuesta
published
3.48
Jonathan Jussely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Suraj Sarvode Mothi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jason Downs
published
Craig Demoss
published 3.5
3.15
Frank Robilio
published
3.13
John Manshack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Santhosh Dinakaran
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Jean-Francois Lejeune
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Josh Bay
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Arun Sashidharan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peyton Neal + Brandon Brackett5072% games+18.3% vs expected
Jason Downs + Frank Robilio3443% games−4.5% vs expected
Suraj Sarvode Mothi + Ryan Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Freddy Ojeda
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Ryan Murray
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.80
Peyton Neal
27W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
3.5
Brandon Brackett
43W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Ramon Cuesta
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Jonathan Jussely
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Suraj Sarvode Mothi
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jason Downs
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Craig Demoss
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Frank Robilio
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
John Manshack
40W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Santhosh Dinakaran
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Jean-Francois Lejeune
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Josh Bay
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Arun Sashidharan
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.