Teams

Sonterra Sol

2025 55 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-04vs Tennis Park Golden RacquettesWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Berman / Ingrid Culver vs Dee Lorkovic / Sonia Roper6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGabriele Coulter / Elsa Ang vs Cheryl Robinson / Kathy Hogan6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRose Stawick / Mary Jo George vs Deborah Owens / Ann Ross6-2, 6-2
2025-02-25vs TBM - love to winWon 21
L#1 DoublesRainy Evans / Kim Griffin vs Jan Keen / Cindy Linville3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesIngrid Culver / Gabriele Coulter vs Janis Wommack / Pam Colvin6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRose Stawick / Sue Baillio vs Kimberly Weldon / Renee Weatherford6-3, 6-0
2025-02-18vs The Swing ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lange / Nora Espinoza vs Shannon Wagner / Peggy Ussery7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabriele Coulter / Ingrid Culver vs Tressa Trayhan / Kelly Outlaw3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRose Stawick / Sue Baillio vs Holly Nelson / Julia Armstrong6-1, 6-2
2025-02-17vs Tennis Park Golden RacquettesWon 21
W#1 DoublesNora Espinoza / Elsa Ang vs Cheryl Robinson / Deborah Owens6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSue Baillio / Gabriele Coulter vs Monica Kosta / Huong Edmondson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLenora Wulfe / Ruth Bates vs Dee Lorkovic / Lynne Aranda4-6, 3-6
2025-02-16vs TBM - love to winWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Womack / Rainy Evans vs Jan Keen / Cindy Linville6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Berman / Ingrid Culver vs Pam Colvin / Susan Erhardt6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRose Stawick / Deborah Lange vs Denise Barrett / Renee Weatherford6-0, 6-2
2025-01-14vs The Swing ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Berman / Gabriele Coulter vs Tressa Trayhan / Kelly Outlaw7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRose Stawick / Sue Baillio vs Peggy Ussery / Sheila Wilson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Gilmer / Kim Griffin vs Stacy Gallo / Shannon Wagner4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Rose Stawick
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Sue Baillio
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Cindy Berman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Deborah Lange
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Nora Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Lisa Womack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Yvette Schycker
published
Elsa Ang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gabriele Coulter
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ingrid Culver
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kelli Grant
published
Lenora Wulfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Koxlien
published
Mary Jo George
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rainy Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Gilmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Culver + Mary Jo George6262% gamesnot enough data
Rose Stawick + Sue Baillio5167% gamesnot enough data
Ingrid Culver + Gabriele Coulter4158% gamesnot enough data
Ingrid Culver + Cindy Berman5080% gamesnot enough data
Ingrid Culver + Rose Stawick404 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Gilmer + Mary Jo George213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rose Stawick
31W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Sue Baillio
38W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Cindy Berman
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Deborah Lange
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Nora Espinoza
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Lisa Womack
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Yvette Schycker
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
Elsa Ang
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriele Coulter
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ingrid Culver
25W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Grant
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lenora Wulfe
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Koxlien
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jo George
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rainy Evans
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Gilmer
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.