Teams

PRC ORANGE

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-07vs CPV BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKelli Swan / Michael Swan vs Andrea Smart / Jeffrey Hilton4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHorst Kisch / Sharon Kisch vs Timothy Linsenmeyer / Kimberly Young2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCeleste Gardner / Scott Kerr vs JoAnn DelMonte / Sebastian Ramos6-3, 6-4
2024-06-30vs SS-LT BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelli Swan / Michael Swan vs Marie Unger / Rich Unger6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHorst Kisch / Sharon Kisch vs Julie Diep / Binh Diep1-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs LTFC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Sharon Kisch vs Mitchell Kaplan / Lisa Lash3-6, 3-6
2024-06-16vs EM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Swan / Kelli Swan vs Ellen Leher / Mark Horn7-6, 6-3
2024-06-09vs PCC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Sharon Kisch vs Patti Milhan / David Milhan7-6, 7-6
2024-06-02vs RRTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Kerr / Celeste Gardner vs Janice Ramirez / Bowen Banbury6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Swan / Michael Swan vs Kristin Mccarty / Ari Brunschwig6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Michael Swan
published
3.40
Scott Kerr
published
3.12
Kelli Swan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Sarah Hughes
published
2.80
Sharon Kisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Celeste Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Lori Lee
published
2.61
Kyle Logan
published
Horst Kisch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Swan + Michael Swan21466% games+5.7% vs expected
Sharon Kisch + Horst Kisch8751% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Swan
43W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Scott Kerr
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
3
Kelli Swan
102W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12
Sarah Hughes
28W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Sharon Kisch
179W–105L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Celeste Gardner
87W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
Lori Lee
35W–25L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kyle Logan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
2.61
Horst Kisch
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.