Teams

Parker

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-05vs ORCC- BenowitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesKurtis Fechtmeyer / William Kolstad vs David Benowitz / Jeffrey Lifson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-13vs Bogen ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Jim HASNIK vs Quang Nystrom / Keith Swift3-6, 2-6
2023-10-30vs ORCC- BenowitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesKurtis Fechtmeyer / William Kolstad vs Alex Gustafson / Tyler Hoffman4-6, 3-6
2023-10-09vs Bogen ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / Kurtis Fechtmeyer vs Christopher Bogen / David Bergeson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Sandozi: Minnesota SLICELost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kolstad / David Kang vs Luke Anderson / Mike Gurrieri2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Parker Lahr
published
3.39
Matt Kline
published
3.39
William Kolstad
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Chris Parker
published 3.5
3.27
David Kang
published 3.5
3.14
Kurtis Fechtmeyer
published
3.10
Jim HASNIK
published
2.98
Jacson Miller
published
2.90
Randal Rovinski
published
2.48
LaMont Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Kolstad + Chris Parker2350% gamesnot enough data
Kurtis Fechtmeyer + David Kang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Lahr
9W–31L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Matt Kline
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
William Kolstad
130W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Chris Parker
23W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
David Kang
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kurtis Fechtmeyer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Jim HASNIK
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jacson Miller
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Randal Rovinski
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.90
LaMont Robinson
0W–24L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.