Teams

St. Mary's Mojos

2024 Calvert Adult 18 & Over · Calvert Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-22vs WillhideWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Abell / Jonathan Ferrell vs Chris Cruzcosa / Jason Wynn7-5, 7-5
2024-06-01vs WillhideWon 10
W#3 DoublesRussell Carrington / Jonathan Ferrell vs Rik Sneeuwjagt / Chris Cruzcosa6-4, 6-3
2024-05-09vs WillhideWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanthan Fallowfield / Jonathan Ferrell vs Bruce Willhide / Chris Cruzcosa6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-20vs WillhideLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Pereira / Jonathan Ferrell vs Jason Wynn / Todd Cervini1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Guillermo Guerrero
published
3.71
Giap Nguyen
published
3.67
Stephen Pereira
published
3.67
Kevin Findley
published
3.67
Andrew Hayes
published 4
3.61
Richard Bishop
published
3.59
Joseph Taylor
published
3.53
3.51
Russell Carrington
published
3.47
Stephen Abell
published
3.44
Thomas Swann
published
3.38
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Carrington + Richard Bishop044 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Taylor + Richard Bishop123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Guillermo Guerrero
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Giap Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Stephen Pereira
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Kevin Findley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Andrew Hayes
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Richard Bishop
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Joanthan Fallowfield
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Russell Carrington
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Stephen Abell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Thomas Swann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 4 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.