Teams

Pinellas/Kosar/18&Over2.5W

2024 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 2.5 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Emily Kennedy3-3
2024-03-05vs RCSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Rasmussen / Sara Newsom vs Kathy Wallen / Julia Schwerin6-0, 6-3
2024-03-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Holly Jean6-1, 6-4
2024-02-10vs Innisbrook HidalgoWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Rasmussen / Sara Newsom vs Cynthia Preyde / Beverly Encarnacion6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Melissa Bryan6-1, 6-4
2024-01-27vs RCSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Kim / Andrea Stuart vs Julia Schwerin / Angela Walker6-3, 6-3
2024-01-20vs Innisbrook HidalgoWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Beverly Encarnacion6-1, 6-2
2024-01-14vs RCSPWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Tamara Inauen6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Andrea Stuart
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.73
Sara Newsom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Lois Larsen
published
2.67
Barbara Turi
published 3
2.55
Tracia Danhour
published
2.53
Renee Rasmussen
published
2.50
Sheila Calistri
published
2.46
Jayme Kosar
published
2.45
Lauren Lelewski
published
2.40
Maureen Ellison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Stuart + Sara Newsom6558% games+1.3% vs expected
Lauren Lelewski + Sheila Calistri123 matchesnot enough data
Jayme Kosar + Sheila Calistri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Stuart
103W–100L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Lois Larsen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Barbara Turi
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Tracia Danhour
5W–25L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Renee Rasmussen
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.53
Sheila Calistri
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jayme Kosar
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Lauren Lelewski
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Maureen Ellison
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%75%25%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.