Teams

Sather/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.29 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-15vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesSamantha Santilli / Margaret Lovelette vs Sarah Vogel / Molly Virgin6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Han vs Lacey Keally6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Sather / Debora Edkin vs Paige Patton / Victoria Lubnik5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJoanie Bowles vs Brooke Keane6-2, 6-3
2024-10-12vs Babu/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesKelly Cole / Tracey Costello vs Kate Tharp / Jaclyn Carney6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoanie Bowles vs Catherine Felton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Sather / Karen Findlay vs Shalini Rose / Kelly Montgomery3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGinger Childs vs Cristin Hambidge6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Bowen / Cristin Roark vs Kristin Barlowe / Katie Ouellette1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ginger Childs
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.34
Cristin Roark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Han
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Tracey Costello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Dawn Bowen
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Samantha Santilli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Debora Edkin
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
JANE KELCHLIN
published
2.95
Beth Sather
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Joanie Bowles
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.78
Karen Findlay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Margaret Lovelette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Caroline Gannon
published 3
2.60
Doreen Caputo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Colleen Wilson
published 3
Donna Stumpf
published
Phaedra Yachimski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Bowen + Debora Edkin4354% games+8.9% vs expected
Samantha Santilli + Tracey Costello4346% games−1.9% vs expected
Doreen Caputo + Margaret Lovelette3644% games−3.9% vs expected
Amanda Han + Ginger Childs3256% gamesnot enough data
Cristin Roark + Ginger Childs404 matchesnot enough data
Beth Sather + Karen Findlay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Childs
30W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Cristin Roark
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Amanda Han
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Tracey Costello
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Dawn Bowen
14W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Samantha Santilli
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Debora Edkin
13W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
JANE KELCHLIN
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Beth Sather
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Joanie Bowles
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Karen Findlay
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Margaret Lovelette
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Caroline Gannon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Doreen Caputo
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
3
Colleen Wilson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Donna Stumpf
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phaedra Yachimski
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.