Teams

NWW-PL-Khullar

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Rajesh Gatti
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Manivel Chandrasekaran
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2024-03-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesVishwanath Nayak / Rajesh Gatti vs Jeff Mcdowell / Chris Serwold6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSudhakar Pitchumani / Manivel Chandrasekaran vs Keith Abernathy / Forrest Reda6-3, 6-1
2024-03-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVishwanath Nayak / Rajesh Gatti vs Alexander Moshchuk / Patrick Formanes6-4, 6-2
2024-02-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesManivel Chandrasekaran / Gaurav Tandon vs David Gregory / Ken Duffie6-3, 6-0
2024-02-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesSudhakar Pitchumani / Manivel Chandrasekaran vs Scott Miller / William Linser6-0, 6-0
2024-01-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesRajesh Gatti / Sudhakar Pitchumani vs Henry Osias / Darren Carrido6-1, 6-2
2024-01-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeepak Khullar / Rajesh Gatti vs Jeff Hsu / Philip Moberg6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Rajesh Gatti
74W–71L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3.5
Manivel Chandrasekaran
47W–51L career
23%77%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.