Teams

FLYHS BARTHELMES

2024 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs CCOC FARMERWon 20
W#1 DoublesLea List / Tisha Hickerson vs Kit McFarland / Anne Janda6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDenny Elston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20vs LTFCS OSTLYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDenny Elston / Julie Maegdlin vs Katherine Hammer / Lisa Ostly1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLea List vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-13vs CSCC KOLMANLost 02
L#1 DoublesLea List / Tisha Hickerson vs Becky Cleveland / Kari Leach0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenny Elston / Michele Noonan vs Kim Weston / Isabel Swenson1-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs CCOC FARMERLost 02
L#1 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Denny Elston vs Jenisha Bonicelli / Anne Janda4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Biewenga vs Michelle Erlander2-6, 2-6
2024-03-30vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 02
L#1 DoublesLacy Utterback / Tisha Hickerson vs Lisa Ostly / Erin Reed4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenny Elston / Julie Maegdlin vs Katherine Hammer / Deena Hiltbrand2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Tisha Hickerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Lea List
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Joy Barthelmes
published
2.65
Melissa Biewenga
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.59
Michele Noonan
published
2.27
Denny Elston
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Reagan Lenhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea List + Tisha Hickerson10256% games+23.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tisha Hickerson
47W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Lea List
35W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Joy Barthelmes
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Melissa Biewenga
35W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Michele Noonan
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
2.5
Denny Elston
49W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Reagan Lenhart
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.