Teams

Smith - PCC

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-05vs Ross - RS HardLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Boucher / Quinten Endacott vs Tim Ekelund / Amatul Bean1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmber Culpepper / Greg Digby vs Hunter Stark / Hannah Pfeifler4-6, 2-6
2025-07-29vs Worley - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoman Kowalski / Sara Boucher vs Joseph Tegenkamp / Grace Tegenkamp4-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs Escambia/Davis/18&Over6.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoman Kowalski / Jennifer Lewis vs Haley Allen / Rick Bucco4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Rasmussen / Kellan Lewis vs Nikki Bucco / Robert Landt6-7, 4-6
2025-07-08vs Vey - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKendall Woodbury / Hurst Butts vs Kelsey Sholes / Phillip Sholes3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Smith / Roman Kowalski vs Vanessa Vey / FRANK LOPRESTI5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-06vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmber Culpepper / Kellan Lewis vs Charlie Culpepper / Victoria Grise1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSara Boucher / Roman Kowalski vs Gregory Vierheilig / Valerie Wilson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs Covington - PCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Boucher / Hurst Butts vs Sandra Wilson / Fletcher Wilson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKellan Lewis / Jennifer Lewis vs KL LeCOQ / Wendy McIntosh Holmes1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amber Culpepper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Sara Boucher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Roman Kowalski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Joshua Lewis
published
2.56
Eric Rasmussen
published
2.42
Greg Digby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Hurst Butts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kellan Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Rasmussen
0W–5L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amber Culpepper
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Sara Boucher
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Roman Kowalski
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Joshua Lewis
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Eric Rasmussen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Greg Digby
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Hurst Butts
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kellan Lewis
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.