Teams

HCC Reynolds

2026 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Kathryn Horsley
published
3.00
Amy Coates
published 3
2.84
Jessica Joyce
published
2.74
Meghan Hale
published
2.73
Miranda Reynolds
published
2.69
Alexia Gerczak
published 3
2.69
Amanda OConnell
published 3
2.67
Alison Chesson
published 3
2.53
Savon Sampson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Joyce + Kathryn Horsley314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Coates + Kathryn Horsley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Horsley
50W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Amy Coates
26W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jessica Joyce
18W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Meghan Hale
25W–19L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Miranda Reynolds
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alexia Gerczak
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Amanda OConnell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Alison Chesson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Savon Sampson
20W–16L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.