Teams

Haub/Knoxville

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 55 & over Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs JThompson/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesCurtis DeFord / Doug Rieger vs Son Duong / Richard Callaway6-0, 6-3
2026-04-19vs Thompson/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Haub / Doug Rieger vs Eric Arnsdorff / T Thompson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Canada / Gary Webb vs Kent Ivey / Tom Walsh4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCurtis DeFord / Chris Gaylor vs Steven Beasley / Robert Liuag1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-18vs Thompson/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesPete Collins / Gary Webb vs Eric Arnsdorff / T Thompson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike Canada / John Reynolds vs Kent Ivey / Tom Walsh2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChris Gaylor / Mark Haub vs Steven Beasley / Robert Liuag6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-12vs JThompson/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Haub / Gary Webb vs Jimmy Hyams / George Paynter6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCurtis DeFord / Jae Yoon vs Son Duong / Huy Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Thompson/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Webb / Mike Canada vs Robert Liuag / Kent Ivey6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMark Haub / Pete Collins vs T Thompson / Eric Arnsdorff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Gaylor / Curtis DeFord vs Gary Irwin / Edgar Lara-Curzio6-2, 6-3
2026-03-24vs JThompson/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Canada / Pete Collins vs Jack Hatfield / Ron Gilley6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDoug Rieger / John Reynolds vs Jimmy Hyams / Huy Nguyen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDoug Yoakley / Jae Yoon vs CHARLES IRVINE / Richard Callaway6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 55 & over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Chris Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Mark Haub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Doug Rieger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Gary Webb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Curtis DeFord
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Mike Canada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jae Yoon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Haub + Chris Gaylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Gaylor
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
Mark Haub
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Doug Rieger
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Gary Webb
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Curtis DeFord
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Mike Canada
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jae Yoon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.