Teams

CCC NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs GR BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesRC Myles / Andy Hancock vs Chris Herring / Brett Linscott7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-08vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRC Myles / Jared Hamilton vs Mike Jaltuch / Erik Egtvedt2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-01vs PH GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesBen Huber / RC Myles vs Alan Kuettel / William Licko7-6, 7-6
2025-06-24vs CK-M REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesWilliam Taylor / Stefan Wenger vs Aaron Merritt / Jay Wren6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTyler Jaccaud vs Egin Bresnig6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Stewart / Jared Hamilton vs James Morrison / Gerald Russell6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Sutton / RC Myles vs Mark Gianetto / Cole Widdowson6-3, 6-1
2025-06-17vs KC-RH GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRC Myles / Andy Hancock vs Joseph Rachwalski / John Tiernan6-7, 3-6
2025-06-10vs GR BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesPhil Kelly / RC Myles vs Brett Linscott / Gabe McFarland - *5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Sean Crowley
published
3.45
Greg Sutton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Tyler Jaccaud
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Stefan Wenger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
RC Myles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Andy Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Burt Katubig
published 3.5
3.10
Jared Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Phil Kelly
published
Matt McCain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Hamilton + Andy Hancock10363% games+9.4% vs expected
Andy Hancock + RC Myles11555% games+3.5% vs expected
Jared Hamilton + Burt Katubig4247% games−5.4% vs expected
Jared Hamilton + RC Myles303 matchesnot enough data
RC Myles + Stefan Wenger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Crowley
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Greg Sutton
31W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tyler Jaccaud
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Stefan Wenger
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
RC Myles
42W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Andy Hancock
32W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Burt Katubig
34W–30L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Jared Hamilton
30W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Phil Kelly
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Matt McCain
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.