Teams

LTA-P PURPLE

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-02vs LTC-M SILVERSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Amita Pandey vs Casey Rhine / Michela Zafferani6-2, 6-1
L#2 Female SinglesChristine Bonthius vs Jenny Jessup3-6, 3-6
2026-07-27vs LTC-M SILVERWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesTess Wright / Christine Bonthius vs Alyssa Cormack / Michela Zafferani7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-06vs KC-CC PINKWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Courtney Chan vs Kara Robbins / Jessica Cleary6-2, 7-5
2026-06-30vs KC-CC PINKLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesTess Wright / Christine Bonthius vs Halia Pena / Melissa Doyle5-7, 5-7
2026-06-16vs LTC-M SILVERWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmita Pandey / Courtney Chan vs Lisa Christman / Lucy McMurry3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-09vs KC-CC PINKWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesOlimpia Mejia / Amita Pandey vs Anitra Sopronyi / Laura Kane7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTA-P PURPLE4211718160
2KC-CC PINK4210819174
3LTC-M SILVER1561226176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Amita Pandey
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Sandra Waters
published
3.94
Olimpia Mejia
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Laura Nagel
published
3.79
Ronnie Meyers
published
3.78
Courtney Chan
published 4
3.69
Tess Wright
published
3.63
Christine Bonthius
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amita Pandey + Olimpia Mejia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amita Pandey
49W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.97
Sandra Waters
13W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Olimpia Mejia
94W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.94
Laura Nagel
18W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Ronnie Meyers
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Courtney Chan
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Tess Wright
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Christine Bonthius
77W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.