Teams

Piccolo/Sasson

2026 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Midtown/EttedguilLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsmael Betancourt / Donovan Lue vs Juan Pablo Cofino / ALEJANDRO PERNIAS2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Uribe / Francisco Romano vs Antonio Macias Valdes / Alberto Ettedgui6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSergio Campos / Oscar Garcia vs Pipo Torrellas / Enrique Bonifaz3-6, 5-7
2026-08-18vs Parkland/NewmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesGABRIELE GHINI / Francisco Romano vs Giovanni Guido / Luis Novella6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSergio Campos / Donovan Lue vs Segundo Decotto / Santiago Restrepo2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSTEVE LEGUEN / Gregory Joseph vs Bruce Kurtz / Alejandro Gonzalez2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
4.21
Arnold Sauce
published 4.5
4.15
GABRIELE GHINI
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Samuel Uribe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Sergio Campos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Ismael Betancourt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Alex Gregory
published 4
3.79
Francisco Romano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Gregory Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Donovan Lue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Sean Lowery
published
3.54
Haim Sasson
published 4
STEVE LEGUEN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Joseph + Donovan Lue12454% games+5.7% vs expected
Gregory Joseph + Arnold Sauce12260% games+5.4% vs expected
Haim Sasson + Gregory Joseph41143% games+2.3% vs expected
Samuel Uribe + Francisco Romano2447% games−5.5% vs expected
Haim Sasson + Alex Gregory1422% games−25.7% vs expected
Haim Sasson + Donovan Lue2550% gamesnot enough data
Haim Sasson + Sean Lowery5256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mauricio Gomm Santos
71W–28L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Arnold Sauce
94W–55L career · type D · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
GABRIELE GHINI
137W–155L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Samuel Uribe
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Sergio Campos
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Ismael Betancourt
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
4
Alex Gregory
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Francisco Romano
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Gregory Joseph
36W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Donovan Lue
66W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Sean Lowery
7W–16L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Haim Sasson
114W–181L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
STEVE LEGUEN
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.